SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarter ended:  June 30, 2003

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from               to              

 

Commission file number:  0-16214

 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

14-0462060

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

1373 Broadway, Albany, New York

 

12204

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code            518-445-2200

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports,) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ý  No  o

 

The registrant had 29,445,399 shares of Class A Common Stock and 3,236,476 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2003.

 

 



 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

 

INDEX

 

Part I

Financial information

 

 

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements

 

 

 

Consolidated statements of income and retained earnings - three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002

 

 

 

Consolidated balance sheets - June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002

 

 

 

Consolidated statements of cash flows - six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002

 

 

 

Notes to consolidated financial statements

 

 

 

Item 2.  Financial Review

 

 

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

 

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

 

Part II

Other information

 

 

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

 

 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

 

 

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 



 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS

(unaudited)

 

(in thousands except per share data)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

223,558

 

$

203,937

 

$

433,971

 

$

395,723

 

Cost of goods sold

 

130,743

 

117,505

 

251,662

 

228,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

92,815

 

86,432

 

182,309

 

166,891

 

Selling, technical, general and research expenses

 

64,270

 

61,348

 

126,058

 

119,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income

 

28,545

 

25,084

 

56,251

 

47,396

 

Interest expense, net

 

3,535

 

4,209

 

7,406

 

8,636

 

Other expense/(income), net

 

2,138

 

(622

)

3,347

 

3,731

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

22,872

 

21,497

 

45,498

 

35,029

 

Income taxes

 

6,890

 

7,524

 

8,434

 

12,260

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before associated companies

 

15,982

 

13,973

 

37,064

 

22,769

 

Equity in earnings of associated companies

 

(7

)

(15

)

(95

)

63

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 

15,975

 

13,958

 

36,969

 

22,832

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of taxes

 

 

 

 

(5,837

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

15,975

 

13,958

 

36,969

 

16,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings, beginning of period

 

406,819

 

346,723

 

387,609

 

345,273

 

Dividends declared

 

(1,799

)

(1,621

)

(3,583

)

(3,208

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained earnings, end of period

 

$

420,995

 

$

359,060

 

$

420,995

 

$

359,060

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share - basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.43

 

$

1.14

 

$

0.71

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

(0.18

)

Net income

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.43

 

$

1.14

 

$

0.53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per share - diluted:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.42

 

$

1.12

 

$

0.70

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

0.00

 

(0.18

)

Net income

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.42

 

$

1.12

 

$

0.52

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average number of shares used in basic earnings per share computations

 

32,605

 

32,214

 

32,522

 

31,913

 

Average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share computations

 

33,163

 

32,846

 

33,009

 

32,568

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividends per share

 

$

0.055

 

$

0.050

 

$

0.11

 

$

0.10

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

1



 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,
2003

 

December 31,
2002

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

59,165

 

$

18,799

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

146,357

 

135,339

 

Note receivable

 

21,364

 

20,075

 

Inventories:

 

 

 

 

 

Finished goods

 

91,127

 

90,766

 

Work in process

 

52,282

 

44,763

 

Raw material and supplies

 

33,274

 

28,534

 

 

 

176,683

 

164,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred taxes

 

34,544

 

43,439

 

Prepaid expenses

 

8,708

 

7,173

 

Total current assets

 

446,821

 

388,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

357,752

 

346,073

 

Investments in associated companies

 

4,916

 

4,849

 

Intangibles

 

16,530

 

16,274

 

Goodwill

 

148,973

 

137,146

 

Deferred taxes

 

68,034

 

65,574

 

Other assets

 

54,107

 

52,717

 

Total assets

 

$

1,097,133

 

$

1,011,521

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Notes and loans payable

 

$

17,107

 

$

12,224

 

Accounts payable

 

30,293

 

39,624

 

Accrued liabilities

 

116,336

 

101,510

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

1,091

 

1,914

 

Income taxes payable and deferred

 

30,664

 

31,222

 

Total current liabilities

 

195,491

 

186,494

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

216,591

 

221,703

 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 

166,971

 

168,765

 

Deferred taxes and other credits

 

33,720

 

33,961

 

Total liabilities

 

612,773

 

610,923

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, par value $5.00 per share; authorized 2,000,000 shares; none issued

 

 

 

Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 31,635,538 in 2003 and 28,983,057 in 2002

 

32

 

29

 

Class B Common Stock, par value $.001 per share; authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,236,476 in 2003 and 5,607,576 in 2002

 

3

 

6

 

Additional paid in capital

 

261,588

 

255,484

 

Retained earnings

 

420,995

 

387,609

 

Accumulated items of other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Translation adjustments

 

(103,770

)

(147,400

)

Derivative valuation adjustment

 

(13,034

)

(13,592

)

Pension liability adjustment

 

(35,962

)

(35,962

)

 

 

529,852

 

446,174

 

Less treasury stock (Class A), at cost (2,190,139 shares in 2003 and 2,193,793 shares in 2002)

 

45,492

 

45,576

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

484,360

 

400,598

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

1,097,133

 

$

1,011,521

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2003

 

2002

 

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

36,969

 

$

16,995

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Equity in earnings of associated companies

 

95

 

(63

)

Depreciation

 

25,567

 

23,029

 

Amortization

 

2,550

 

2,470

 

Provision for deferred income taxes, other credits and long-term liabilities

 

3,410

 

(401

)

Provision for impairment of goodwill

 

 

5,837

 

Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance

 

(1,470

)

(1,340

)

Unrealized currency transaction (gains)/losses

 

(1,199

)

115

 

Gain on disposition of assets

 

(529

)

(2,971

)

Shares contributed to ESOP

 

3,528

 

2,736

 

Tax benefit of options exercised

 

322

 

1,643

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

6,885

 

(5,780

)

Sale of accounts receivable

 

(2,603

)

(1,076

)

Note receivable

 

(1,290

)

2,844

 

Inventories

 

(2,742

)

(4,798

)

Prepaid expenses

 

(1,535

)

(1,802

)

Accounts payable

 

(9,331

)

(10,727

)

Accrued liabilities

 

6,826

 

(1,731

)

Income taxes payable

 

(558

)

4,969

 

Other, net

 

(615

)

2,625

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

64,280

 

32,574

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

(18,702

)

(11,420

)

Purchased software

 

(423

)

(270

)

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

3,824

 

3,789

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(15,301

)

(7,901

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from borrowings

 

34,532

 

37,661

 

Principal payments on debt

 

(36,161

)

(48,558

)

Dividends paid

 

(3,568

)

(3,208

)

Proceeds from options exercised

 

2,248

 

14,683

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities

 

(2,949

)

578

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash flows

 

(5,664

)

13,915

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

40,366

 

39,166

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

 

18,799

 

6,153

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

59,165

 

$

45,319

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

3



 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1.  Management Opinion

 

In the opinion of management the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of only normal, recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of results for such periods.  The results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted.  These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2002.  Certain prior period data have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

 

2.  Goodwill and Intangibles

 

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (FAS No. 142), “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. FAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually.  The Company performs the test for goodwill impairment during the second quarter of each year.  Goodwill and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events such as significant changes in the business climate, plant closures, changes in product offerings, or other circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  The Company is continuing to amortize certain patents and trade names that have finite lives.

 

The remaining acquired intangible assets and goodwill of the Company as of June 30, 2003 were as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at
December 31, 2002

 

Year to Date
Amortization

 

Currency
Translation/other

 

Balance at
June 30, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortizable Intangible Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Patents

 

$

3,241

 

$

(195

)

$

343

 

$

3,389

 

Trade Names

 

3,566

 

(272

)

380

 

3,674

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

6,807

 

(467

)

723

 

7,063

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Pension Costs

 

9,467

 

 

 

9,467

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Intangibles

 

$

16,274

 

$

(467

)

$

723

 

$

16,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unamortized Intangible Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

137,146

 

$

 

$

11,827

 

$

148,973

 

 

As of June 30, 2003, the remaining goodwill included $122.4 million in the Engineered Fabrics segment and $26.5 million in the Albany Door Systems segment.

 

4



 

Amortization expense relating to intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2003 amounted to $0.5 million.  Estimated amortization expense (in thousands) for the years ending December 31, 2003 through 2007 is as follows:

 

Year

 

Annual
Amortization

 

2003

 

$

950

 

2004

 

950

 

2005

 

950

 

2006

 

950

 

2007

 

950

 

 

3.  Other Expense/(Income), Net

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Currency transactions

 

$

(405

)

$

(2,410

)

$

(820

)

$

(298

)

Debt costs

 

570

 

524

 

1,135

 

965

 

Securitization program

 

348

 

462

 

694

 

1,169

 

Other miscellaneous expenses

 

1,625

 

802

 

2,338

 

1,895

 

Total

 

$

2,138

 

$

(622

)

$

3,347

 

$

3,731

 

 

During 2001, the Company entered into a trade accounts receivable program whereby it sells, without recourse, certain North American accounts receivable to a Qualified Special Purpose Entity (QSPE), as defined under Financial Accounting Standard, No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (FAS No. 140).  The QSPE is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and, in accordance with FAS No. 140, its financial statements are not consolidated with the financial statements of the Company.

 

The QSPE finances a portion of the accounts receivable purchased by selling an undivided ownership interest in the pool of purchased receivables to an unrelated third party for cash.  The balance of the purchase price is financed by the Company, in exchange for a note receivable.  In addition to financing a portion of the purchase price, the Company performs certain administration functions for the QSPE, including collecting the accounts receivable, in exchange for a fee.

 

Eligible accounts receivable are sold at a discount to the QSPE on an ongoing basis at the discretion of the Company and the amount is subject to change.  The eligibility of accounts receivable is based on certain criteria agreed to by the Company and the unrelated third party.  The discount rate is determined by the average time the accounts receivable are outstanding, current interest rates, and estimated credit losses.

 

The amount of receivables sold as of June 30, 2003 was approximately $68.5 million.  The Company received $45.7 million in cash and a note receivable in the amount of $21.4 million in exchange for the accounts receivable sold.  The discount is included in other expense/(income), net, and was $0.7 million and $1.2 million for the six month periods ending June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 

5



 

The unconsolidated subsidiary receives cash from an unrelated third party in exchange for an undivided ownership interest in the accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2003, the unconsolidated subsidiary had assets of $21.4 million consisting primarily of the $68.5 million of accounts receivables sold to it by the Company, net of the $45.7 million interest sold to the unrelated third party, and an allowance for doubtful accounts.  As of June 30, 2003, the liabilities of the unconsolidated subsidiary were $21.4 million consisting principally of the note payable to the Company.

 

The accounts receivable securitization program is a low cost source of financing for the Company and can be terminated at any time, with thirty days notice, by the Company or the unrelated third party.

 

4.  Earnings Per Share

 

Net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding during the period.  Diluted net income per share includes the effect of all potentially dilutive securities.

 

The amounts used in computing earnings per share, including the effect on income and the weighted average number of shares of potentially dilutive securities, are as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income available to common stockholders

 

$

15,975

 

$

13,958

 

$

36,969

 

$

16,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares used in calculating basic net income per share

 

32,605

 

32,214

 

32,522

 

31,913

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options

 

558

 

632

 

487

 

655

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares used in calculating diluted net income per share

 

33,163

 

32,846

 

33,009

 

32,568

 

 

An option to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at $25.56 per share was outstanding at June 30, 2003, but was not included in the computation of diluted net income per share because the option’s exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares.  The average market price of the common shares was $24.75 and $23.58 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

 

6



 

5.  Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

15,975

 

$

13,958

 

$

36,969

 

$

16,995

 

Other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

32,775

 

34,008

 

43,630

 

36,408

 

Current period change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax

 

(572

)

(4,580

)

558

 

(2,437

)

Total comprehensive income

 

$

48,178

 

$

43,386

 

$

81,157

 

$

50,966

 

 

6.  Operating Segment Data

 

The following table shows data by operating segment, reconciled to consolidated totals included in the financial statements:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Engineered Fabrics

 

$

186,341

 

$

171,219

 

$

362,882

 

$

332,707

 

Albany Door Systems

 

23,854

 

22,120

 

46,391

 

41,887

 

Applied Technologies

 

13,363

 

10,598

 

24,698

 

21,129

 

Consolidated total

 

$

223,558

 

$

203,937

 

$

433,971

 

$

395,723

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Engineered Fabrics

 

$

42,464

 

$

40,028

 

$

83,873

 

$

76,923

 

Albany Door Systems

 

14

 

163

 

(444

)

276

 

Applied Technologies

 

1,834

 

1,993

 

3,756

 

3,379

 

Research expense

 

(6,580

)

(6,048

)

(13,052

)

(12,331

)

Unallocated expenses

 

(9,187

)

(11,052

)

(17,882

)

(20,851

)

Operating income before reconciling items

 

28,545

 

25,084

 

56,251

 

47,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciling items:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

(3,535

)

(4,209

)

(7,406

)

(8,636

)

Other (expense)/income, net

 

(2,138

)

622

 

(3,347

)

(3,731

)

Consolidated income before income taxes

 

$

22,872

 

$

21,497

 

$

45,498

 

$

35,029

 

 

There was no material change in the total assets of the reportable segments during the six months ended June 30, 2003.

 

7



 

7.  Income Taxes

 

Second quarter income tax expense decreased due to a reduction of the estimated effective income tax rate from 35% in the second quarter of 2002 to 30% in 2003.  The Company expects the effective tax rate to remain at 30% for the second half of 2003.  In the first quarter of 2003, the Company received notification of the final resolution regarding certain income tax matters, which resulted in a reduction to 2003 tax expense of $5.2 million.

 

8.  Contingencies

 

Albany International Corp. (‘‘Albany’’) is a defendant in suits brought in various courts in the United States by plaintiffs who allege that they have suffered personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products previously manufactured by Albany. Albany’s production of asbestos-containing paper machine clothing products was limited to certain synthetic dryer fabrics marketed during the period from 1967 to 1976 and used in certain paper mills. Such fabrics generally had a useful life of three to twelve months.

 

Albany was defending against 28,457 such claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 28,112 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 22,593 claims as of December 31, 2002, 7,347 claims as of December 31, 2001, 1,997 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 2,276 claims as of December 31, 1999. These suits allege a variety of lung and other diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by Albany.

 

Albany anticipates that additional claims will be filed against it and the related companies in the future but is unable to predict the number and timing of such future claims. These suits typically involve claims against from twenty to over two hundred defendants, and the complaints usually fail to identify the plaintiffs’ work history or the nature of the plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to Albany’s products. In the vast majority of these suits, claimant work histories have not been provided. In cases in which work histories have been provided, approximately one-third of the claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill, and only a portion of those claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill to which Albany is believed to have supplied asbestos-containing products.

 

Approximately 24,646 of the claims pending against Albany are filed in various counties in Mississippi. The Company expects that only a portion of these claimants will be able to demonstrate time spent in a paper mill to which Albany supplied asbestos-containing products during a period in which Albany’s asbestos-containing products were in use. Based on past experience, communications from certain plaintiffs’ counsel and the advice of the Company’s Mississippi counsel, the Company expects the percentage of claimants with paper mill exposure in the Mississippi proceedings to be considerably lower than the total number of claims asserted. It is the position of Albany and the other paper machine clothing defendants that there was insufficient exposure to asbestos from any paper machine clothing products to cause asbestos-related injury to any plaintiff. Furthermore, asbestos contained in Albany’s synthetic products was encapsulated in a resin-coated yarn woven into the interior of the fabric, further reducing the likelihood of fiber release. While the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these claims, it has settled certain of these cases for amounts it considers reasonable given the facts and circumstances of each case. The Company’s insurer, Liberty Mutual, has defended each case under a standard reservation of rights. As of August 1, 2003, the Company had resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,913 claims, and had reached tentative agreement to resolve an additional 4,563 claims reported above as pending. The total cost of resolving all 9,476 such claims was $5,026,000. Of this amount, $4,991,000, or 99%, was paid by the Company’s insurance carrier. The Company has more than $130 million in confirmed insurance coverage that should be available with respect to current and future asbestos claims, as well as additional insurance coverage that it should be able to access.

 

8



 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc.

 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc. (‘‘Brandon’’), a subsidiary of Geschmay Corp., is also a separate defendant in most of these cases. Brandon was defending against 11,972 claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 11,954 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 11,802 claims as of December 31, 2002, 8,759 claims as of December 31, 2001, 3,598 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 1,887 claims as of December 31, 1999. The Company acquired Geschmay Corp., formerly known as Wangner Systems Corporation, in 1999. Brandon is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Geschmay Corp.  In 1978, Brandon acquired certain assets from Abney Mills (‘‘Abney’’), a South Carolina textile manufacturer. Among the assets acquired by Brandon from Abney were assets of Abney’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Brandon Sales, Inc. which, among other things, had sold dryer fabrics containing asbestos made by its parent, Abney. It is believed that Abney ceased production of asbestos-containing fabrics prior to the 1978 transaction. Although Brandon manufactured and sold dryer fabrics under its own name subsequent to the asset purchase, none of such fabrics contained asbestos. Under the terms of the Assets Purchase Agreement between Brandon and Abney, Abney agreed to indemnify, defend, and hold Brandon harmless from any actions or claims on account of products manufactured by Abney and its related corporations prior to the date of the sale, whether or not the product was sold subsequent to the date of the sale. It appears that Abney has since been dissolved. Nevertheless, a representative of Abney has been notified of the pendency of these actions and demand has been made that it assume the defense of these actions. Because Brandon did not manufacture asbestos-containing products, and because it does not believe that it was the legal successor to, or otherwise responsible for obligations of, Abney with respect to products manufactured by Abney, it believes it has strong defenses to the claims that have been asserted against it. In some instances, plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed claims against it, while in others it has entered into what it considers to be reasonable settlements. As of August 1, 2003, Brandon has resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,229 claims for a total of $152,499. Brandon’s insurance carriers have agreed to pay 88.2% of the total indemnification and defense costs related to these proceedings, subject to the standard reservation of rights. The remaining 11.8% is being sought from an insurance company that denies that it issued a policy. Brandon’s internal records demonstrate otherwise, and Brandon has filed suit against this company as well as its other carriers. Based on advice of counsel, Brandon is confident that it will prevail in establishing 100% indemnification and defense cost coverage.

 

Mount Vernon

 

In some of these cases, the Company is named both as a direct defendant and as the ‘‘successor in interest’’ to Mount Vernon Mills (‘‘Mount Vernon’’). The Company acquired certain assets from Mount Vernon in 1993. Certain plaintiffs allege injury caused by asbestos-containing products alleged to have been sold by Mount Vernon many years prior to this acquisition. Mount Vernon is contractually obligated to indemnify the Company against any liability arising out of such products. The Company denies any liability for products sold by Mount Vernon prior to the acquisition of the Mount Vernon assets. Pursuant to its contractual indemnification obligations, Mount Vernon has assumed the defense of these claims. On this basis, the Company has successfully moved for dismissal in a number of actions.

 

The Company believes that all asbestos-related claims against it are without merit. Based on its understanding of the insurance policies available, how settlement amounts have been allocated to various policies, its recent settlement experience, the absence of any judgments against the Company or Brandon, the ratio of paper mill claims to total claims filed, and the defenses available, the Company currently does not anticipate any material liability relating to the resolution of the aforementioned pending proceedings in excess of existing insurance limits. Consequently, the Company does not believe, based on currently available information, that the ultimate resolution of the aforementioned proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

9



 

Although the Company cannot predict the number and timing of future claims, based on the foregoing factors and the trends in claims against it to date, the Company does not anticipate that additional claims likely to be filed against it in the future will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company is aware that litigation is inherently uncertain, especially when the outcome is dependent primarily on determinations of factual matters to be made by juries. The Company is also aware that numerous other defendants in asbestos cases, as well as others who claim to have knowledge and expertise on the subject, have found it difficult to anticipate the outcome of asbestos litigation, the volume of future asbestos claims and the anticipated settlement values of those claims. For these reasons, there can be no assurance that the foregoing conclusions will not change.

 

Other Proceedings

 

The Company has been named as respondent in an arbitration filed in the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”).  The Request for Arbitration was filed on February 17, 2003 by Mistral International Finance A.G. and Golden Bridge S.A. (the “Claimants”).  The Claimants seek to recover $19,123,589 based upon an alleged breach of a Share Purchase Agreement by which the Company purchased all of the shares of six wholly owned subsidiaries of Claimants, alleging that the subsequent termination of certain leases by a subsidiary of the Company deprived the Claimants of a portion of the purchase price of these shares.  The Company has filed an answer denying any liability, and is proceeding to vigorously defend against this claim.

 

9.  Restructuring

 

Pursuant to the restructuring initiatives announced in 2001, the Company has terminated 614 employees. The change in accrued restructuring costs from December 31, 2002 to June 30, 2003 was as follows:

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31,
2002

 

Payments

 

Currency/
Translation/other

 

June 30,
2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination costs

 

$

5,311

 

$

(2,263

)

$

269

 

$

3,317

 

Plant rationalization costs

 

551

 

(129

)

0

 

422

 

Lease oblilgations

 

3,571

 

(916

)

156

 

2,811

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

9,433

 

$

(3,308

)

$

425

 

$

6,550

 

 

10



 

10.  Stock Options

 

The Company has Stock Option plans for key employees.  For options issued prior to 2003, the Company accounted for non-cash stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (APB 25), and its related interpretations, which state that no compensation expense is recognized for stock options that are granted with an exercise price equal to or above the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date.   Option exercise prices were equal to and were not permitted to be less than the market value on the date of grant.  Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized as a result of stock options granted.

 

In accordance with the prospective approach described in Financial Accounting Standard No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, an Amendment of FAS No. 123” (FAS No. 148), the Company will record compensation expense for the fair value of any stock options granted after December 31, 2002. No options were granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2003. The expense for new stock options will be recorded over the vesting period of the options, normally five years. The impact of expensing options cannot currently be determined, since stock options are granted at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

 

The Company has also adopted the disclosure requirements of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (FAS No. 123) and FAS No. 148 with respect to pro forma disclosure of compensation expense for options issued prior to January 1, 2003. For purposes of the pro forma disclosures, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  Had the Company recorded compensation expense for the fair value of stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003, net income and earnings per share would have been affected as indicated by the pro forma amounts below.

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
June 30,

 

Six Months Ended
June 30,

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

2003

 

2002

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proforma stock-based employee compensation cost, net of taxes

 

$

608

 

$

578

 

$

1,216

 

$

1,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income, as reported

 

$

15,975

 

$

13,958

 

$

36,969

 

$

16,995

 

Pro forma

 

15,367

 

13,380

 

35,753

 

15,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per share, as reported

 

$

0.49

 

$

0.43

 

$

1.14

 

$

0.53

 

Pro forma

 

0.47

 

0.42

 

1.10

 

0.49

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share, as reported

 

$

0.48

 

$

0.42

 

$

1.12

 

$

0.52

 

Pro forma

 

0.46

 

0.41

 

1.08

 

0.48

 

 

11.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”, (FAS No. 150). This Standard establishes how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.  This standard becomes effective for any financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS No. 150, to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

11



 

In April 2003, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (FAS No. 149). This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and other hedging activities entered into after June 30, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS No. 149, to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. This interpretation gives guidance that determines whether consolidation of a Variable Interest Entity is required. The Company has a subsidiary that is not consolidated in these financial statements because it is a Qualified Special Purpose Entity under FAS No. 140 (see note 3). The interpretation is effective for all variable interest entities with which the Company becomes involved beginning in February 2003, and all pre-existing entities beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

12



 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.

 

Financial Review

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Assumptions

 

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operation are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).  The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgements that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

 

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments.  If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

 

The Company has interest rate swap agreements that fix the rate of interest on $200 million of the Company’s debt.  The Company has determined that the swaps qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with GAAP, and accordingly, changes in the fair value of these swaps are recorded in shareholders’ equity in the caption, “Derivative valuation adjustment”.  Future events, such as a change in the Company’s underlying debt arrangements, could require that the Company record changes in fair value in earnings. The Company values these swaps by estimating the cost of entering into one or more inverse swap transactions that would neutralize the original transactions.  As of June 30, 2003, the pre-tax cost to neutralize the original swap transactions would have been approximately $21.4 million.

 

Goodwill and other long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events such as significant changes in the business climate, plant closures, changes in product offerings, or other circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company performs a test for goodwill impairment at least annually.  The determination of whether these assets are impaired involves significant judgment based upon short and long-term projections of future performance. Changes in strategy and/or market conditions may result in adjustments to recorded asset balances.

 

The Company has pension and postretirement benefit costs and liabilities that are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including discount rates and expected return on plan assets, which are updated on an annual basis. The Company is required to consider current market conditions, including changes in interest rates, in making these assumptions. Changes in the related pension and postretirement benefit costs or credits may occur in the future due to changes in the assumptions.

 

During 2001, the Company entered into a trade accounts receivable program whereby it sells, without recourse, certain North American accounts receivable to a Qualified Special Purpose Entity (QSPE), as defined under Financial Accounting Standard No. 140 “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (FAS No. 140). The QSPE is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and, in accordance with FAS No. 140, its financial statements are not consolidated with the financial statements of the Company.  As of June 30, 2003, the Company had sold accounts receivable of $68.5 million

 

13



 

and received cash of $45.7 million plus a note receivable in the amount of $21.4 million.  If the securitization program were terminated, the Company would not be required to repay the $45.7 million of cash, but no additional accounts receivable would be sold under the program.  Accounts receivable would increase as new sales are made, and the note receivable would decrease as the sold accounts receivable were collected.  The Company might need to borrow from its existing credit facilities or use existing cash to fund operations until cash flow from accounts receivable returns to normal levels.

 

The unconsolidated subsidiary receives cash from an unrelated third party in exchange for an undivided ownership interest in the accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2003, the unconsolidated subsidiary had assets of $21.4 million consisting primarily of the $68.5 million of accounts receivables sold to it by the Company, net of the $45.7 million interest sold to the unrelated third party, and an allowance for doubtful accounts.  As of June 30, 2003, the liabilities of the unconsolidated subsidiary were $21.4 million consisting principally of the note payable to the Company.

 

Asbestos Litigation

 

Albany International Corp. (‘‘Albany’’) is a defendant in suits brought in various courts in the United States by plaintiffs who allege that they have suffered personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products previously manufactured by Albany. Albany’s production of asbestos-containing paper machine clothing products was limited to certain synthetic dryer fabrics marketed during the period from 1967 to 1976 and used in certain paper mills. Such fabrics generally had a useful life of three to twelve months.

 

Albany was defending against 28,457 such claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 28,112 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 22,593 claims as of December 31, 2002, 7,347 claims as of December 31, 2001, 1,997 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 2,276 claims as of December 31, 1999. These suits allege a variety of lung and other diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by Albany. Albany anticipates that additional claims will be filed against it and the related companies in the future but is unable to predict the number and timing of such future claims. These suits typically involve claims against from twenty to over two hundred defendants, and the complaints usually fail to identify the plaintiffs’ work history or the nature of the plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to Albany’s products. In the vast majority of these suits, claimant work histories have not been provided. In cases in which work histories have been provided, approximately one-third of the claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill, and only a portion of those claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill to which Albany is believed to have supplied asbestos-containing products.

 

Approximately 24,646 of the claims pending against Albany are filed in various counties in Mississippi. The Company expects that only a portion of these claimants will be able to demonstrate time spent in a paper mill to which Albany supplied asbestos-containing products during a period in which Albany’s asbestos-containing products were in use. Based on past experience, communications from certain plaintiffs’ counsel and the advice of the Company’s Mississippi counsel, the Company expects the percentage of claimants with paper mill exposure in the Mississippi proceedings to be considerably lower than the total number of claims asserted. It is the position of Albany and the other paper machine clothing defendants that there was insufficient exposure to asbestos from any paper machine clothing products to cause asbestos-related injury to any plaintiff. Furthermore, asbestos contained in Albany’s synthetic products was encapsulated in a resin-coated yarn woven into the interior of the fabric, further reducing the likelihood of fiber release. While the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these claims, it has settled certain of these cases for amounts it considers reasonable given the facts and circumstances of each case. The Company’s insurer, Liberty Mutual, has defended each case under a standard reservation of rights. As of August 1, 2003, the Company had resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,913 claims, and had reached tentative agreement to resolve

 

14



 

an additional 4,563 claims reported above as pending. The total cost of resolving all 9,476 such claims was $5,026,000. Of this amount, $4,991,000, or 99%, was paid by the Company’s insurance carrier. The Company has more than $130 million in confirmed insurance coverage that should be available with respect to current and future asbestos claims, as well as additional insurance coverage that it should be able to access.

 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc.

 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc. (‘‘Brandon’’), a subsidiary of Geschmay Corp., is also a separate defendant in most of these cases. Brandon was defending against 11,972 claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 11,954 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 11,802 claims as of December 31, 2002, 8,759 claims as of December 31, 2001, 3,598 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 1,887 claims as of December 31, 1999. The Company acquired Geschmay Corp., formerly known as Wangner Systems Corporation, in 1999. Brandon is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Geschmay Corp. In 1978, Brandon acquired certain assets from Abney Mills (‘‘Abney’’), a South Carolina textile manufacturer. Among the assets acquired by Brandon from Abney were assets of Abney’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Brandon Sales, Inc. which, among other things, had sold dryer fabrics containing asbestos made by its parent, Abney. It is believed that Abney ceased production of asbestos-containing fabrics prior to the 1978 transaction. Although Brandon manufactured and sold dryer fabrics under its own name subsequent to the asset purchase, none of such fabrics contained asbestos. Under the terms of the Assets Purchase Agreement between Brandon and Abney, Abney agreed to indemnify, defend, and hold Brandon harmless from any actions or claims on account of products manufactured by Abney and its related corporations prior to the date of the sale, whether or not the product was sold subsequent to the date of the sale. It appears that Abney has since been dissolved. Nevertheless, a representative of Abney has been notified of the pendency of these actions and demand has been made that it assume the defense of these actions. Because Brandon did not manufacture asbestos-containing products, and because it does not believe that it was the legal successor to, or otherwise responsible for obligations of, Abney with respect to products manufactured by Abney, it believes it has strong defenses to the claims that have been asserted against it. In some instances, plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed claims against it, while in others it has entered into what it considers to be reasonable settlements. As of August 1, 2003, Brandon has resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,229 claims for a total of $152,499. Brandon’s insurance carriers have agreed to pay 88.2% of the total indemnification and defense costs related to these proceedings, subject to the standard reservation of rights. The remaining 11.8% is being sought from an insurance company that denies that it issued a policy. Brandon’s internal records demonstrate otherwise, and Brandon has filed suit against this company as well as its other carriers. Based on advice of counsel, Brandon is confident that it will prevail in establishing 100% indemnification and defense cost coverage.

 

Mount Vernon

 

In some of these cases, the Company is named both as a direct defendant and as the ‘‘successor in interest’’ to Mount Vernon Mills (‘‘Mount Vernon’’). The Company acquired certain assets from Mount Vernon in 1993. Certain plaintiffs allege injury caused by asbestos-containing products alleged to have been sold by Mount Vernon many years prior to this acquisition. Mount Vernon is contractually obligated to indemnify the Company against any liability arising out of such products. The Company denies any liability for products sold by Mount Vernon prior to the acquisition of the Mount Vernon assets. Pursuant to its contractual indemnification obligations, Mount Vernon has assumed the defense of these claims. On this basis, the Company has successfully moved for dismissal in a number of actions.

 

The Company believes that all asbestos-related claims against it are without merit. Based on its understanding of the insurance policies available, how settlement amounts have been allocated to various policies, its recent settlement experience, the absence of any judgments against the Company or Brandon, the ratio of paper mill

 

15



 

claims to total claims filed, and the defenses available, the Company currently does not anticipate any material liability relating to the resolution of the aforementioned pending proceedings in excess of existing insurance limits. Consequently, the Company does not believe, based on currently available information, that the ultimate resolution of the aforementioned proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

Although the Company cannot predict the number and timing of future claims, based on the foregoing factors and the trends in claims against it to date, the Company does not anticipate that additional claims likely to be filed against it in the future will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company is aware that litigation is inherently uncertain, especially when the outcome is dependent primarily on determinations of factual matters to be made by juries. The Company is also aware that numerous other defendants in asbestos cases, as well as others who claim to have knowledge and expertise on the subject, have found it difficult to anticipate the outcome of asbestos litigation, the volume of future asbestos claims and the anticipated settlement values of those claims. For these reasons, there can be no assurance that the foregoing conclusions will not change.

 

Other Proceedings

 

The Company has been named as respondent in an arbitration filed in the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”).  The Request for Arbitration was filed on February 17, 2003 by Mistral International Finance A.G. and Golden Bridge S.A. (the “Claimants”).  The Claimants seek to recover $19,123,589 based upon an alleged breach of a Share Purchase Agreement by which the Company purchased all of the shares of six wholly owned subsidiaries of Claimants, alleging that the subsequent termination of certain leases by a subsidiary of the Company deprived the Claimants of a portion of the purchase price of these shares.  The Company has filed an answer denying any liability, and is proceeding to vigorously defend against this claim.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

 

Total Company – three months ended June 30, 2003

 

Net sales increased to $223.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $203.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002.  Changes in currency translation rates had the effect of increasing net sales by $19.6 million.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 net sales were flat as compared to 2002.

 

Following is a table that includes second-quarter net sales for each business segment and the effect of changes in currency translation rates:

 

 

 

Net sales as reported
Three months ended June 30,

 

Increase in 2003
net sales due to changes in
currency translation rates

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

Engineered Fabrics

 

$

186,341

 

$

171,219

 

$

15,364

 

Albany Door Systems

 

23,854

 

22,120

 

3,470

 

Applied Technologies

 

13,363

 

10,598

 

731

 

Total

 

$

223,558

 

$

203,937

 

$

19,565

 

 

16



 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 41.5% for the second quarter of 2003, as compared to 42.4% for the same period last year.  The decrease was due principally due to higher costs associated with the implementation of cost reduction initiatives and the effect of currency rate fluctuations.

 

Second quarter selling, technical, general and research expenses increased 4.8% in 2003 as compared to 2002.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, these expenses decreased 3.8%.  The previously mentioned cost reduction initiatives contributed to the decline in these expenses.

 

Operating income increased to $28.5 million for the second quarter of 2003, as compared to $25.1 million for the second quarter of 2002.  Changes in currency translation rates had the effect of increasing operating income by $2.4 million. Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 operating income increased 4.4% as compared to 2002. The increase is principally due to the benefits derived from cost reduction initiatives.  Second quarter operating income as a percentage of net sales was 12.8% in 2003 and 12.3% in 2002.

 

Interest expense, net, declined to $3.5 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared to $4.2 million for the second quarter of 2002.  The decrease is principally due to lower average debt in 2003.

 

Other expense/(income), net, was expense of $2.1 million in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $0.6 million of income in the second quarter of 2002.  The difference in 2003 is principally due to the remeasurement of intercompany balances at operations that held amounts denominated in currencies other than their local currency.

 

Second quarter income tax expense decreased due to a reduction of the estimated effective income tax rate from 35% in the second quarter of last year to 30% this year.  The Company expects the effective tax rate to remain at 30% for the second half of 2003.

 

Net income was $16.0 million for the second quarter of 2003, compared to $14.0 million in the second quarter of 2002.  Basic earnings per share were $0.49 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $0.43 in the second quarter of 2002. The improvement in 2003 is principally due to benefits resulting from cost reduction initiatives, and reductions in interest expense, net, and income tax expense.

 

Total Company – six months ended June 30, 2003

 

Net sales increased to $434.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to $395.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002.  Changes in currency translation rates had the effect of increasing net sales by $33.1 million.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 net sales were up 1.3% as compared to 2002.

 

Following is a table that includes net sales of each business segment for the first six months of each year and the effect of changes in currency translation rates:

 

 

 

Net sales as reported
Six months ended June 30,

 

Increase in 2003
net sales due to changes in
currency translation rates

 

(in thousands)

 

2003

 

2002

 

 

Engineered Fabrics

 

$

362,882

 

$

332,707

 

$

25,524

 

Albany Door Systems

 

46,391

 

41,887

 

6,680

 

Applied Technologies

 

24,698

 

21,129

 

930

 

Total

 

$

433,971

 

$

395,723

 

$

33,134

 

 

17



 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 42.0% for the first six months of 2003, as compared to 42.2% for the same period last year.  The decrease was due principally due to higher costs associated with the implementation of cost reduction initiatives and the effect of currency rate fluctuations.

 

Selling, technical, general and research expenses increased 5.5% for the first six months of 2003 as compared to 2002.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, these expenses decreased 2.5%.  The previously mentioned cost reduction initiatives contributed to the decline in these expenses.

 

Operating income increased to $56.3 million for the first six months of 2003, as compared to $47.4 million for the same period of 2002.   Changes in currency translation rates had the effect of increasing operating income by $2.6 million. Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 operating income increased 13.2% as compared to 2002. The increase is principally due to higher sales and the benefits derived from cost reduction initiatives.  Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 13.0% in 2003 and 12.0% in 2002.

 

Interest expense, net, declined to $7.4 million for the first six months of 2003 compared to $8.6 million for the same period of 2002.  The decrease is principally due to lower average debt in 2003.

 

Income tax expense was $8.4 million for the first six months of 2003, compared to $12.3 million for the same period of 2002.  The decrease is due, in part, to a reduction of the estimated effective income tax rate from 35 percent in 2002 to 30% in 2003.   In addition, the Company received notification of the final resolution regarding certain income tax matters during the first quarter of 2003, which resulted in a reduction to first-quarter 2003 income tax expense of $5.2 million.

 

The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 (FAS No. 142) effective January 1, 2002.  In accordance with FAS No. 142, the Company performed a transitional impairment test and determined that the goodwill in the Applied Technologies segment should be written off.  The charge of $5.8 million, or $0.18 per share, was recorded as the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in 2002.  There was no tax effect from this charge.

 

Net income was $37.0 million for the first six months of 2003, compared to $17.0 million for the same period of 2002.  Basic earnings per share were $1.14 in 2003 compared to $0.53 in 2002. The improvement in 2003 is principally due to higher sales, the benefits resulting from cost reduction initiatives, lower interest expense, net, the lower estimated effective tax rate, the resolution of certain income tax matters in 2003, and the charge in 2002 related to the adoption of FAS No. 142.

 

Reasons for changes in operating results for the six month period ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the corresponding period in 2002 are similar to those which affected the three month comparisons, except where specifically noted.

 

Engineered Fabrics Segment – three months ended June 30, 2003

 

Engineered Fabrics segment net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 8.8% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, second-quarter 2003 net sales were flat.

 

Paperboard operating rates globally were unchanged overall but did reflect some regional demand increases.  Paper operating rates remained very weak, especially in the United States.  Paper and paperboard production

 

18



 

did improve slightly in major markets, but overall industry consumption of paper machine clothing (PMC) in the first half of 2003 was unchanged from the same period of 2002.

 

Excluding changes in currency translation rates, 2003 second-quarter net sales in North America and Europe were lower in comparison to the same period of 2002 due to economic weakness, and were offset by net sales increases in Asia and South America.  In Asia, despite the adverse impact of SARS on regional order activity, PMC sales improved modestly.  As the Company’s representatives resume travel activity in the region, the Company expects future orders to return to normal levels.  To improve efficiency in Asia, sales coverage assignments were restructured in that region during the second quarter.  Sales of new product upgrades increased during the second quarter, reflecting customers’ desire for new PMC technologies to reduce major operating costs and improve paper and paperboard properties.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 43.9% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to 45.6% for the same period of 2002. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 22.8% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to 23.4% for the second quarter of 2002. The decreases in 2003 are due to higher costs associated with the implementation of cost reduction initiatives and the effects of currency rate fluctuation.

 

Engineered Fabrics Segment – six months ended June 30, 2003

 

Engineered Fabrics segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 9.1% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 net sales increased by 1.4%.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to 44.4% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 45.0% for the same period of 2002. Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 23.1% for the first six months of 2003 and 2002.   The 2003 results include higher costs related to the implementation of cost reduction initiatives, offset by the savings from the previously completed cost reduction programs.

 

Albany Door Systems Segment – three months ended June 30, 2003

 

Albany Door Systems segment net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 7.8% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, second-quarter 2003 net sales were 7.8% lower.

 

Weak economic conditions continued to affect sales of high-performance doors. Low-capital spending levels, particularly in the major high-performance door markets of the United States and Germany, continue to affect this segment.  During the quarter, the Company announced the closure of its door manufacturing facility in Canada and the consolidation of North American operations into the Lawrenceville, Georgia, plant during the third quarter of 2003.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 32.9% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 31.5% in the same period of 2002.  Operating income in the second quarter of 2003 was $14,000 compared to $163,000 in the second quarter of 2002. The decrease in operating income is principally due to lower sales, excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates.

 

19



 

Albany Door Systems Segment – six months ended June 30, 2003

 

Albany Door Systems segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 10.8% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, 2003 net sales were 5.2% lower.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 32.1% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 32.4% in the same period of 2002.  Operating income for the first six months of 2003 was a loss of $444,000 compared to income of $276,000 in 2002. The decrease in operating income is principally due to lower sales, excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates.

 

Applied Technologies Segment – three months ended June 30, 2003

 

Applied Technologies segment net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 26.1% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, second- quarter 2003 net sales were 19.2% higher.

 

Results for this segment, particularly for tannery and textile products in Europe and South America, were encouraging.  In addition, sales of PrimaLoft® premium synthetic insulation for apparel and home furnishings continued to grow, as market penetration into Europe expands.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 37.9% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to 45.3% in the same period of 2002.  Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 13.7% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 18.8% in the second quarter of 2002.   The lower percentages in 2003 are due to higher costs associated with the implementation of cost reduction initiatives, changes in the mix of products sold, and costs incurred to expand market penetration.

 

Applied Technologies Segment – six months ended June 30, 2003

 

Applied Technologies segment net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same period in 2002 were 16.9% higher.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, second-quarter 2003 net sales were 12.5% higher.

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 40.5% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 43.0% for the same period of 2002.  Operating income as a percentage of net sales was 15.2% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 16.0% for the same period of 2002. The lower percentages in 2003 are due to higher costs associated with the implementation of cost reduction initiatives, changes in the mix of products sold, and costs incurred to expand market penetration.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES:

 

Accounts receivable increased $11.0 million since December 31, 2002.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, accounts receivable decreased $3.1 million.  Inventories increased $12.6 million during the six months ended June 30, 2003.  Excluding the effect of changes in currency translation rates, inventories increased $2.7 million.

 

During 2001, the Company entered into a program to sell a portion of its North American accounts receivable. In exchange for the accounts receivable sold, the Company receives cash and a note.  As of June 30, 2003, the Company had sold $68.5 million of accounts receivable under this program.  The Company has received

 

20



 

cash of $45.7 million, plus a note receivable which has a balance of $21.4 million as of June 30, 2003.  The note is subject to monthly fluctuation based on the amount of receivables sold and bears interest at variable rates.  As of June 30, 2003, the interest rate was 2.06%.

 

Cash flow was strong in the first six months of 2003.  Net cash provided by operating activities was $64.3 million, compared to $32.6 million for the same period of 2002.

 

Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2003 were $18.7 million as compared to $11.4 million for the same period last year.  The Company anticipates that capital expenditures will be approximately $55 million for the full year and will continue to finance these expenditures with cash from operations and existing credit facilities.  The increase in capital expenditures is due to the planned investments in France and Finland and our emphasis on operational efficiency and process improvement.

 

The Company’s principal debt agreement terminates in August 2004, and all amounts outstanding under such agreement must be repaid by that time. The Company expects to refinance its debt before the revolving credit agreement expires in 2004.  At June 30, 2003, a total of $200 million was outstanding under this agreement.  The Company currently anticipates that it will repay this obligation prior to August 2004 with a combination of cash generated by operations and proceeds of replacement or alternative financing.  Under its principal debt agreement, the Company could have borrowed an additional $275 million at June 30, 2003.  The Company’s ability to borrow additional amounts under the credit agreement is conditional upon the absence of any material adverse change.  Management believes that this debt capacity, in combination with informal commitments and expected cash flows, should be sufficient to meet anticipated operating requirements and normal business opportunities that support corporate strategies.

 

Cash and cash equivalents increased $40.4 million to $59.2 million during the first six months of 2003.  For the first six months of each year, dividends declared were $0.11 and $0.10 per share for 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 

As of June 30, 2003, the Company had accrued liabilities for restructuring of approximately $6.6 million.  The Company anticipates that cash payments of this liability will be approximately $2.7 million in 2003, $2.0 million in 2004, $0.6 million in 2005, $0.5 million in 2006, $0.5 million in 2007 and $0.3 million thereafter.

 

The Company has guaranteed a letter of credit to a bank that loaned money to a joint venture partner in South Africa.  The bank can draw upon the letter of credit if the joint venture partner defaults on the loan.  The letter of credit is denominated in South African rand and was approximately $3.7 million as of June 30, 2003.  The Company has not recorded a liability related to this guarantee.

 

Outlook:

 

The Company continues to realize benefits from previous cost reduction steps taken and is making progress with the current $30 million cost reduction program.  Net income included expenses related to this program of $1.3 million, or $0.03 per share, for the second quarter and $2.1 million, or $0.05 per share, for the first six months of 2003.  The Company expects charges associated with this initiative to increase substantially in the second half of 2003, with the major portion of the charges expected in the first half of 2004.  The full effects of this and previously completed cost reduction programs should provide significant earnings benefits in the second half of 2004.

 

21



 

The Company anticipates 2003 capital expenditures will increase to approximately $55 million, resulting from the planned investments in France and Finland and emphasis on operational efficiency and process improvement.

 

Despite the combination of higher capital expenditures and an estimated $20 million contribution to the United States pension plan,  cash may increase slightly in the second half of 2003.  The prospects are good for substantial net cash flows in 2004, particularly in the second half following the completion of the cost reduction programs.  Management is evaluating on an ongoing basis which alternative uses for cash would be most beneficial to shareholders.

 

Continued emphasis on technology development in product and processes should improve efficiency and increase revenue for all of our business segments.  Increased global attention to the Albany Value Concept, a program that matches products and services to customer needs, helps the Company focus its efforts on activities that deliver greater value to customers and improve returns to shareholders.

 

Non-GAAP Measures

 

This Form 10-Q contains certain non-GAAP financial measures.  Such measures are provided because management believes that, when presented together with the GAAP items to which they relate, they can provide additional useful information to investors regarding the registrant’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

The effect of changes in currency translation rates is calculated by converting amounts reported in local currencies into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of a prior period.  That amount is then compared to the U.S. dollar amount reported in the current period.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standard, FAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity “, (FAS No., 150). This Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity.  This standard becomes effective for any financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003.  The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS No. 150 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

In April 2003, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard, FAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (FAS No. 149). This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under FASB No. 133 entered into after June 30, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FAS No. 149, to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), “Consolidation of Variable Interest

Entities”. This interpretation gives guidance that determines whether consolidation of a Variable Interest Entity is required. The Company has a subsidiary that is not consolidated in these financial statements because it is a Qualified Special Purpose Entity under FAS No. 140. The interpretation is effective for all variable interest entities with which the Company becomes involved beginning in February 2003, and all pre-existing entities beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not expect the adoption of FIN 46 to have a material effect on its financial statements.

 

22



 

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

There has been no significant change in the Company’s exposure to market risk during the first six months of 2003.  For discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risk, refer to “Market Sensitivity” in “Financial Review” on page 45 of the Company’s Annual Report incorporated by reference in Form 10-K for the calendar year 2002.

 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

 

The Company, with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.  Based upon, and as of the date of, that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the periodic reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the management of the Company, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls, or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to above. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses identified in the evaluation and, therefore, no corrective actions have been taken since the date of the evaluation.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q, including statements about future sales, earnings, pricing, markets, cost reductions, new products and process improvements, paper industry consolidation and outlook, capital expenditures, tax rates, cash flow, debt agreements and refinancing, pension funding, litigation, adoption of new accounting standards, depreciation, and amortization, are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such statements are based on current expectations and are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, economic conditions affecting the paper industry and other risks and uncertainties set forth in the Company’s 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders and subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

23



 

Part II - Other Information

 

Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

Albany International Corp. (‘‘Albany’’) is a defendant in suits brought in various courts in the United States by plaintiffs who allege that they have suffered personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos-containing products previously manufactured by Albany. Albany’s production of asbestos-containing paper machine clothing products was limited to certain synthetic dryer fabrics marketed during the period from 1967 to 1976 and used in certain paper mills. Such fabrics generally had a useful life of three to twelve months.

 

Albany was defending against 28,457 such claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 28,112 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 22,593 claims as of December 31, 2002, 7,347 claims as of December 31, 2001, 1,997 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 2,276 claims as of December 31, 1999. These suits allege a variety of lung and other diseases based on alleged exposure to products previously manufactured by Albany.

 

Albany anticipates that additional claims will be filed against it and the related companies in the future but is unable to predict the number and timing of such future claims. These suits typically involve claims against from twenty to over two hundred defendants, and the complaints usually fail to identify the plaintiffs’ work history or the nature of the plaintiffs’ alleged exposure to Albany’s products. In the vast majority of these suits, claimant work histories have not been provided. In cases in which work histories have been provided, approximately one-third of the claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill, and only a portion of those claimants have alleged time spent in a paper mill to which Albany is believed to have supplied asbestos-containing products.

 

Approximately 24,646 of the claims pending against Albany are filed in various counties in Mississippi. The Company expects that only a portion of these claimants will be able to demonstrate time spent in a paper mill to which Albany supplied asbestos-containing products during a period in which Albany’s asbestos-containing products were in use. Based on past experience, communications from certain plaintiffs’ counsel and the advice of the Company’s Mississippi counsel, the Company expects the percentage of claimants with paper mill exposure in the Mississippi proceedings to be considerably lower than the total number of claims asserted. It is the position of Albany and the other paper machine clothing defendants that there was insufficient exposure to asbestos from any paper machine clothing products to cause asbestos-related injury to any plaintiff. Furthermore, asbestos contained in Albany’s synthetic products was encapsulated in a resin-coated yarn woven into the interior of the fabric, further reducing the likelihood of fiber release. While the Company believes it has meritorious defenses to these claims, it has settled certain of these cases for amounts it considers reasonable given the facts and circumstances of each case. The Company’s insurer, Liberty Mutual, has defended each case under a standard reservation of rights. As of August 1, 2003, the Company had resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,913 claims, and had reached tentative agreement to resolve an additional 4,563 claims reported above as pending. The total cost of resolving all 9,476 such claims was $5,026,000. Of this amount, $4,991,000, or 99%, was paid by the Company’s insurance carrier. The Company has more than $130 million in confirmed insurance coverage that should be available with respect to current and future asbestos claims, as well as additional insurance coverage that it should be able to access.

 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc.

 

Brandon Drying Fabrics, Inc. (‘‘Brandon’’), a subsidiary of Geschmay Corp., is also a separate defendant in most of these cases. Brandon was defending against 11,972 claims as of August 1, 2003. This compares with 11,954 such claims as of May 2, 2003, 11,802 claims as of December 31, 2002, 8,759 claims as of December 31, 2001, 3,598 claims as of December 31, 2000, and 1,887 claims as of December 31, 1999. The Company acquired Geschmay Corp., formerly known as Wangner Systems Corporation, in 1999. Brandon is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Geschmay Corp.  In 1978, Brandon acquired certain assets from Abney Mills (‘‘Abney’’), a

 

24



 

South Carolina textile manufacturer. Among the assets acquired by Brandon from Abney were assets of Abney’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Brandon Sales, Inc. which, among other things, had sold dryer fabrics containing asbestos made by its parent, Abney. It is believed that Abney ceased production of asbestos-containing fabrics prior to the 1978 transaction. Although Brandon manufactured and sold dryer fabrics under its own name subsequent to the asset purchase, none of such fabrics contained asbestos. Under the terms of the Assets Purchase Agreement between Brandon and Abney, Abney agreed to indemnify, defend, and hold Brandon harmless from any actions or claims on account of products manufactured by Abney and its related corporations prior to the date of the sale, whether or not the product was sold subsequent to the date of the sale. It appears that Abney has since been dissolved. Nevertheless, a representative of Abney has been notified of the pendency of these actions and demand has been made that it assume the defense of these actions. Because Brandon did not manufacture asbestos-containing products, and because it does not believe that it was the legal successor to, or otherwise responsible for obligations of, Abney with respect to products manufactured by Abney, it believes it has strong defenses to the claims that have been asserted against it. In some instances, plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed claims against it, while in others it has entered into what it considers to be reasonable settlements. As of August 1, 2003, Brandon has resolved, by means of settlement or dismissal, 4,229 claims for a total of $152,499. Brandon’s insurance carriers have agreed to pay 88.2% of the total indemnification and defense costs related to these proceedings, subject to the standard reservation of rights. The remaining 11.8% is being sought from an insurance company that denies that it issued a policy. Brandon’s internal records demonstrate otherwise, and Brandon has filed suit against this company as well as its other carriers. Based on advice of counsel, Brandon is confident that it will prevail in establishing 100% indemnification and defense cost coverage.

 

Mount Vernon

 

In some of these cases, the Company is named both as a direct defendant and as the ‘‘successor in interest’’ to Mount Vernon Mills (‘‘Mount Vernon’’). The Company acquired certain assets from Mount Vernon in 1993. Certain plaintiffs allege injury caused by asbestos-containing products alleged to have been sold by Mount Vernon many years prior to this acquisition. Mount Vernon is contractually obligated to indemnify the Company against any liability arising out of such products. The Company denies any liability for products sold by Mount Vernon prior to the acquisition of the Mount Vernon assets. Pursuant to its contractual indemnification obligations, Mount Vernon has assumed the defense of these claims. On this basis, the Company has successfully moved for dismissal in a number of actions.

 

The Company believes that all asbestos-related claims against it are without merit. Based on its understanding of the insurance policies available, how settlement amounts have been allocated to various policies, its recent settlement experience, the absence of any judgments against the Company or Brandon, the ratio of paper mill claims to total claims filed, and the defenses available, the Company currently does not anticipate any material liability relating to the resolution of the aforementioned pending proceedings in excess of existing insurance limits. Consequently, the Company does not believe, based on currently available information, that the ultimate resolution of the aforementioned proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

 

Although the Company cannot predict the number and timing of future claims, based on the foregoing factors and the trends in claims against it to date, the Company does not anticipate that additional claims likely to be filed against it in the future will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company is aware that litigation is inherently uncertain, especially when the outcome is dependent primarily on determinations of factual matters to be made by juries. The Company is also aware that numerous other defendants in asbestos cases, as well as others who claim to have knowledge and expertise on the subject, have found it difficult to anticipate the outcome of asbestos litigation, the volume of

 

25



 

future asbestos claims and the anticipated settlement values of those claims. For these reasons, there can be no assurance that the foregoing conclusions will not change.

 

Other Proceedings

 

The Company has been named as respondent in an arbitration filed in the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”).  The Request for Arbitration was filed on February 17, 2003 by Mistral International Finance A.G. and Golden Bridge S.A. (the “Claimants”).  The Claimants seek to recover $19,123,589 based upon an alleged breach of a Share Purchase Agreement by which the Company purchased all of the shares of six wholly owned subsidiaries of Claimants, alleging that the subsequent termination of certain leases by a subsidiary of the Company deprived the Claimants of a portion of the purchase price of these shares.  The Company has filed an answer denying any liability, and is proceeding to vigorously defend against this claim.

 

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 8, 2003 the only item subject to a vote of security holders was the election of eleven directors.

 

In the vote for the election of eleven members of the Board of Directors of the Company, the number of votes cast for, and the number of votes withheld from, each of the nominees were as follows:

 

 

 

Number of Votes For

 

Number of Votes Withheld

 

Broker Nonvotes

 

Nominee

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frank R. Schmeler

 

23,876,880

 

45,634,610

 

863,835

 

 

 

 

Thomas R. Beecher, Jr.

 

24,031,647

 

45,634,610

 

709,068

 

 

 

 

Charles B. Buchanan

 

24,030,894

 

45,634,610

 

709,821

 

 

 

 

Francis L. McKone

 

23,278,408

 

45,634,610

 

1,462,307

 

 

 

 

G. Allan Stenshamn

 

14,800,209

 

45,617,570

 

9,940,506

 

 

 

17,040

 

Barbara P. Wright

 

15,333,686

 

45,634,610

 

9,407,029

 

 

 

 

Joseph G. Morone

 

15,332,835

 

45,634,610

 

9,407,880

 

 

 

 

Christine L. Standish

 

14,755,929

 

45,634,610

 

9,984,786

 

 

 

 

Erland E. Kailbourne

 

15,431,870

 

45,624,110

 

9,308,845

 

 

 

10,500

 

James L. Ferris

 

15,437,927

 

45.634,610

 

9,302,788

 

 

 

 

John C. Standish

 

14,830,394

 

45,634,610

 

9,910,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

31.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

31.2

 

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.

32.1

 

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  This certification is not deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

26



 

On April 24, 2003, the earnings announcement for the first quarter of 2003 was reported on Form 8-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Item 12, “Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Conditions”.

 

27



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

 

ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP.

 

 

 

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date:  August 8, 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by

/s/ Michael C. Nahl

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michael C. Nahl

 

 

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 


Exhibit 31.1

 

Certification

 

I, Frank R. Schmeler, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Albany International Corp.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

c)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation, and

 

d).          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 8, 2003

 

 

By

/s/ Frank R. Schmeler

 

 

 

Frank R. Schmeler

 

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 


Exhibit 31.2

 

Certification

 

I, Michael C. Nahl, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Albany International Corp.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.               Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a).           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

c).           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation, and

 

d).          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting,  to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data and

 

b).          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

Date:  August 8, 2003

 

 

By

/s/ Michael C. Nahl

 

 

 

Michael C. Nahl

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 


Exhibit 32.1

 

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), Frank R. Schmeler, the Chief Executive Officer and Michael C. Nahl, the Chief Financial Officer of Albany International Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2003 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, for the period covered by the report.

 

 

Dated:  August 8, 2003

 

 

 

 

/s/ Frank R. Schmeler

 

 

 

 

Frank R. Schmeler

 

 

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Michael C. Nahl

 

 

 

 

Michael C. Nahl

 

 

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer